Real-world outcomes of mavacamten for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: global evidence from COLLIGO-HCM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background / Introduction The mavaCamten ObservationaL evIdence Global cOnsortium in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a global observational study aiming to describe the real-world outcomes of treatments for obstructive HCM, including mavacamten. Participating sites from COLLIGO HCM were located in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. Sites differed in requirements for genotyping and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). Purpose To describe the effectiveness and safety of mavacamten in an international, real-world setting. Methods Retrospective data were collected from existing medical records and electronic registries. Patient characteristics, symptoms, echocardiography data, and adverse events were analyzed at baseline and varying follow-up. Results The COLLIGO-HCM cohort (N = 278) is a racially diverse population with 23.2% Black, 5.4% Asian, 4.3% Middle Eastern or North African participants, with a median follow-up duration of 29.3 weeks (IQR: 13.9-48.3 weeks). At baseline, 92.8% of patients (n=258) had some type of background medication (e.g., beta-blocker [BB] and/or calcium channel blocker [CCB], Table) at the time of mavacamten initiation and 7.2% (n=20) started mavacamten as monotherapy. Of those with some form of background medication, 26.4% (n = 68) discontinued at least one type of therapy, and 14.0% (n = 36) down titrated their background medication after mavacamten initiation (Fig Panel A). For those patients with follow up of at least 12 weeks, 66.5% (180 /208) of patients taking mavacamten had a NYHA classification of II or below, this proportion was 94.5% (153/162) for those with week 24 follow up and remained consistent throughout week 96 (Fig. Panel B). By week 24, most patients achieved mean left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOT) gradients of ≤30 mm Hg both at rest and with Valsalva manoeuvre (90.3% and 76.8%, respectively), and 60.1% of patients achieved ≥ 1 NYHA class improvement by that time., Fig Panel C. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post mavacamten initiation remained at or above 61% throughout follow-up (baseline value 66%). Temporary interruption of mavacamten due to LVEF ≤ 50% occurred in 11 (4%, 10 recovered and resumed treatment) patients and permanent discontinuation in 3 (1.1%, all recovered). Conclusions Findings from COLLIGO-HCM indicate that mavacamten is safe and effective in reducing LVOT obstruction and improving symptom burden in a racially diverse patient population treated in a real-world setting in 4 continents, with outcomes similar to those seen in more selected, clinical randomised controlled trials. The proportion of patients with LVEF ≤ 50% found in this study, including sites with and without REMS requirements, is aligned with the published safety profile of mavacamten.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".