MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416738636 · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100645

The relationship between glymphatic system, multi-level stress response, and psychological resilience

2025· article· en· W4416738636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel R. Jin, Li Liang, Horace Tong, Menglu Chen, Tatia M.C Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterCapital Medical University
KeywordsGlymphatic systemPsychological resilienceResilience (materials science)Stress (linguistics)Psychological stressFight-or-flight responseEndocrine systemPhotovoice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stress promotes affective, neural, endocrine, and immune responses. The glymphatic system, essential for waste clearance and immune homeostasis, protects the brain against adverse neurobiological changes. However, it remains unclear how the glymphatic system changes during acute stress, coordinates with multi-level stress responses, and relates to psychological resilience in humans. Methods: We recruited 84 healthy middle-aged adults (mean age 29.26 ± 2.91, 50 males) without major physical, neurological, or psychological conditions. Glymphatic system function was assessed via the coupling between global blood-oxygen-level-dependent and cerebrospinal fluid signals (gBOLD-CSF coupling) before, immediately after, and 60 min after the Montreal Imaging Stress Task. Mood states, neural responses (BOLD signal changes), acute and awakening cortisol responses, and psychological resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) were measured. We compared gBOLD-CSF coupling changes over time using repeated-measures ANOVA, and investigated their associations with affective, neural, endocrine responses, and resilience with linear models and network analysis. Results: gBOLD-CSF coupling was stronger at baseline and after recovery compared to immediately after stress. Changes in gBOLD-CSF coupling were associated with stress-related negative affect and prefrontal neural response. The cortisol response to acute stress was related to gBOLD-CSF coupling response to stress, depending on the level of the cortisol awakening response. The glymphatic system emerged as a central mediator of multi-organ stress response. Finally, post- to pre-stress changes in gBOLD-CSF coupling were associated with psychological resilience. Conclusions: The glymphatic system transiently fluctuates during acute stress, synergizing with affective, neural, and endocrine networks, playing significant roles in stress response and psychological resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.446
GPT teacher head0.583
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical and Health PsychologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207