Homotypic endoplasmic reticulum membrane tethering is critical for flavivirus replication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
) are arthropod-borne viruses which cause approximately 400 million annual global infections in humans. Flavivirus infection requires cellular machinery to facilitate replication and spread. All known flaviviruses replicate in association with the host endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where genome replication is confined within virus-induced ER invaginations called viral replication organelles (vROs). Despite the central role of these structures during flavivirus infection, the mechanisms underlying vRO biogenesis remain undefined - particularly the membrane rearrangements required for their formation. In this work, we report a conserved role for a cellular ER remodeling protein, atlastin-2 (ATL2), in the organization of vROs within infected cells. Using confocal and electron microscopy, we show that ATL2 depletion leads to a reduction in vRO spatial distribution in flavivirus-infected cells. Changes in vRO distribution corresponded with a decrease in virus production and robust induction of innate immune responses. We also demonstrate that ATL2 accumulates in areas of vRO formation during flavivirus infection. Critically, mutational analysis showed that a tethering-competent but fusion-defective ATL2 mutant was sufficient to rescue DENV and ZIKV replication in ATL2-knockout cells. Finally, inhibition of ATL2 activity using synthetic peptides significantly reduced DENV replication in both immortalized and human primary cells, suggesting a possible avenue for targeting host ER functions to limit flavivirus replication. Taken together, these results show that membrane tethering plays a critical and conserved role in flavivirus infection, functioning to organize membranes for vRO biogenesis and limit cellular immune activation. Importantly, we provide evidence that ATL2-mediated membrane organization can be targeted to inhibit viral replication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".