MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416757437 · doi:10.1159/000549295

Acknowledgement to Reviewers

2025· article· en· W4416757437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetic and Genome Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcknowledgementGenomeMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The editors and Karger Publishers would like to thank the following reviewers for their ongoing support in reviewing manuscripts for Cytogenetic and Genome Research:Robert B. Angus, Egham, UKKristina Aubell, Graz, AustriaIrina Y. Bakloushinskaya, Moscow, RussiaMir R. Bekheirnia, Houston, TX, USAMatthew T. Biegler, New York, NY, USALarisa Biltueva, Novosibirsk, RussiaVilhelm Bohr, Copenhagen, DenmarkDanon C. Cardoso, Ouro Preto, BrazilAcácia F.L. Carvalho, Salvador, BrazilNicolas Chatron, Bron, FranceWilliam Conway, Cambridge, MA, USASumito Dateki, Nagasaki, JapanAsya Davidian, Baltimore, MD, USAKelly Dawe, Athens, GA, USAEdivaldo H. C. de Oliveira, Ananindeua, BrazilDmitrij Dedukh, Libechov, CzechiaTiago Degrandi, Curitiba, BrazilHolli Drendel, Charlotte, NC, USAElena Drosopoulou, Thessaloníki, GreeceMunis Dundar, Kayseri, TurkeyChitho Feliciano, Quezon City, PhilippinesSvetlana A. Galkina, St. Petersburg, RussiaSujay Ghosh, Kolkata, IndiaPatrick R. Gonzales, Lenexa, KN, USAChrystian A.G. Haerter, Manaus, BrazilBen Hilton, Secaucus, NJ, USARon Hochstenbach, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsIvan Iourov, Moscow, RussiaM. Anwar Iqbal, Rochester, NY, USASylvie Jaillard, Rennes, FrancePaul Kalitsis, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaRie Kawamura, Toyoake, JapanMartin Knytl, Prague, CzechiaDavid Kopecký, Olomouc, CzechiaDieter Kotzot, Salzburg, AustriaRafael Kretschmer, Porto Alegre, BrazilRakesh Kumar, Katra, IndiaKenji Kurosawa, Tokyo, JapanIgor N. Lebedev, Tomsk, RussiaThomas Liehr, Jena, GermanySilvia Llambí, Montevideo, UruguayDenilce M. Lopes, Viçosa, BrazilLuciana B. Lourenço, São Paulo, BrazilHuiming Lu, Dallas, TX, USAAndrea Luchetti, Bologna, ItalyVladimir Lukhtanov, St. Petersburg, RussiaRhadia Mkacher, Paris, FranceKeith A. Maggert, Tucson, AZ, USAZuzana Majtánová, Libechov, CzechiaValérie Malan, Paris, FranceLyubov P. Malinovskaya, Novosibirsk, RussiaKeiko Matsubara, Tokyo, JapanJean McGowan-Jordan, Ottawa, ON, CanadaIkuo Miura, Higashi-Hiroshima, JapanAmal M. Mohamed, Cairo, EgyptDaniela Moralli, Oxford, UKGopeshwar Narayan, Varanasi, IndiaMasafumi Nozawa, Tokyo, JapanPatricia P. Parise-Maltempi, Rio Claro, BrazilEric L. Patterson, East Lansing, MI, USASvetlana V. Pavlova, Moscow, RussiaDijana Perovic, Belgrade, SerbiaVenkatachalam Perumal, Porur, IndiaMaría I. Pigozzi, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaHelia Pimentel, Würzburg, GermanyMartin Poot, Würzburg, GermanyLuca Proietti De Santis, Viterbo, ItalyMarija Rajičić, Belgrade, SerbiaTerje Raudsepp, College Station, TX, USAJosephine Reinhardt, Geneseo, NY, USATamas Revay, Calgary, AB, CanadaLucia Rocco, Caserta, ItalyTerri L. Ryan, Oak Ridge, TN, USAManisha Sachan, Prayagraj, IndiaAlsu F. Saifitdinova, St. Petersburg, RussiaFrancisco M.C. Sassi, Chongqing, ChinaIngo Schubert, Gatersleben, GermanyVorasuk Shotelersuk, Bangkok, ThailandJulia Sidorova, Washington, DC, USASergey A. Simanovsky, Moscow, RussiaThomas Smol, Lille, FranceKornsorn Srikulnath, Bangkok, ThailandGanesh Subramaniam, Kanpur, IndiaYue-Qiu Tan, Changsha, ChinaRungroj Thangpong, Pathum Wan, ThailandKaterina V. Tishakova, Novosibirsk, RussiaYehuda Tzfati, Jerusalem, IsraelYoshinobu Uno, Tokushima, JapanRicardo Utsunomia, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilStanislav Vasilyev, Tomsk, RussiaGopalrao V.N. Velagaleti, San Antonio, TX, USAAlex Matheus Viana, Manaus, BrazilLingxi Wang, Chengdu, ChinaAnja Weise, Jena, GermanyYuliang Wu, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaKumiko Yanagi, Tokyo, JapanAtsuo Yoshido, Ceske Budejovice, CzechiaDiana Zheglo, Moscow, Russia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetic and Genome ResearchSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207