MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416757442 · doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2025.106296

Identification of novel potentially causative RYR1 variants in individuals with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility

2025· article· en· W4416757442 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela Rossi, Carlotta Pranzo, Sara Roccabianca, Lucía Galli, Alfredo Orrico, Giovanna Sorbello, Vincenzo Tegazzin, Pasquale D’Onofrio, Stefano Perni, Egidio Maria Rubino, Matteo Serano, Gianna Berti, Diego Lopergolo, Alessandro Malandrini, Filip Van Petegem, Vincenzo Sorrentino

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromuscular Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaEuropean CommissionMinistero dell'Istruzione e del MeritoFrench Muscular Dystrophy AssociationAssociation Française contre les Myopathies
KeywordsRYR1Malignant hyperthermiaMuscle biopsyGenetic testingCentral core diseaseBiopsyContractureGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility (MHS) is a pharmacogenetic disorder triggered by volatile anesthetics and muscle relaxants, leading to a hypermetabolic reaction in skeletal muscle that can be fatal if untreated. Diagnosis relies on an in vitro contracture test (IVCT) on muscle biopsy and/or genetic testing for pathogenic variants in the RYR1 gene, which accounts for most cases; less frequently, variants are found in CACNA1S and STAC3. However, unlike the IVCT, genetic testing is limited by the large number of RYR1 variants classified as of uncertain significance (VUS), preventing it from fully replacing the IVCT. We report data from 250 MHS individuals followed over 20 years, in whom 100 RYR1 and 3 CACNA1S variants were identified. Among the RYR1 variants, 81 were previously reported and 19 were novel, all classified as VUS according to European Malignant Hyperthermia Group (EMHG) and Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) criteria. Similarly, of the 3 CACNA1S variants, 1 was previously reported and 2 were classified as VUS. The reporting of novel variants is crucial for improving the accuracy and consistency of variant classification, thereby supporting a more precise interpretation of their clinical significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuromuscular DisordersSame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207