Sex-specific modifications of gametogenesis in natural and lab-bred <i>Fundulus</i> spp. hybrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Successful interspecific hybridization can be limited by a variety of reproductive barriers, including the emergence of asexual lineages which, while relatively rare in animals, is an example of a strong post zygotic barrier. In vertebrates, asexual reproduction typically arises through gametogenic alterations such as premeiotic genome endoreplication or meiotic failure, yet the relative frequency of and conditions leading to these alterations remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate natural, all female clonal hybrid lineages and laboratory-bred hybrids of both sexes between two North American killifishes, the Banded Killifish ( Fundulus diaphanus ) and Common Killifish ( F. heteroclitus ), to determine the mechanisms underlying and maintaining the emergence of asexual reproduction. By combining cytogenetic, molecular, and gametogenetic analyses, we show that all natural and some lab-bred F1 hybrid females can produce diploid and tetraploid oocytes, with natural hybrids producing a higher proportion of tetraploid eggs. In diploid oocytes, we observed both bivalents and univalents. In contrast, tetraploid oocytes exclusively formed bivalents with normal crossover formation, consistent with premeiotic genome endoreplication restoring proper meiotic pairing and facilitating clonal reproduction. Wild and lab-bred hybrid males do not undergo premeiotic genome duplication and exhibit extensive chromosomal mispairing, leading to aberrant meiotic divisions, elevated apoptosis, and decreased fertility or sterility. Together, these findings highlight sex-specific differences in gametogenesis, paralleling patterns observed in other systems, and emphasize the relative ease with which asexual reproduction can arise in hybrid females, in contrast to the sterility commonly observed in hybrid males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".