Using phage display for rational engineering of a higher-affinity humanized 3’ phosphohistidine-specific antibody
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Histidine phosphorylation is a non-canonical post-translational modification (PTM), with 1-phosphohistidine (1-pHis) and 3-phosphohistidine (3-pHis) isoforms, that is understudied due to a lack of robust reagents, including high-affinity pHis-specific antibodies. Engineering pHis antibodies is challenging due to the labile nature of its phosphoramidate (P-N) bond. We developed a strategy for in vitro engineering of antibodies for the detection of native 3-pHis targets, in which the rabbit SC44-8 anti-3-pTza mAb is humanized into a scaffold (hSC44) that is suitable for phage display. Six unique Fab phage-displayed hSC44 scaffold libraries were screened for antibodies that bound 3-pHis with higher affinity and had specificity for 3-pHis versus 3-pTza. hSC44.20N32F L , the best engineered antibody, has ~10-fold higher affinity for 3-pHis than parental hSC44. Eleven new Fab structures, including the first antibody-pHis peptide structures, together with structural and quantum mechanical calculations, provided molecular insights into 3-pHis and 3-pTza discrimination by hSC44.20N32F L and the increased affinity obtained through engineering. We demonstrated the utility of these high-affinity 3-pHis-specific antibodies for the recognition of pHis proteins in mammalian cells by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence staining. Our work describes a general method for engineering labile PTM-specific antibodies and provides novel antibodies for investigating the role of 3-pHis in cell biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".