Fragment-based drug design of a bacterial kinase inhibitor capable of increasing the antibiotic sensitivity of clinical isolates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), antimicrobial resistance is a serious global health issue. Overcoming antibiotic resistance involves several strategies, including the inhibition of resistance mechanisms. Among the various resistance mechanisms, aminoglycoside phosphotransferases (APHs) catalyze the transfer of the γ-phosphate from a nucleotide donor to various aminoglycosides, leading to their inactivation. In this work, using a fragment-based drug design (FBDD) approach, we have identified and characterized a promising APH inhibitor capable of increasing the sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus resistant to aminoglycosides. It is therefore a good candidate for the future development of APH inhibitors to be prescribed in combination with aminoglycosides. This molecule is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), the phosphate donor of APHs. Further studies are required to optimize this molecule to improve its specificity for APHs and its bioavailability in bacteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".