MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416766283 · doi:10.1111/dom.70317

<scp>PIONEER REAL</scp> Saudi Arabia: A multicentre, prospective, real‐world study of once‐daily oral semaglutide use in adults with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia

2025· article· en· W4416766283 on OpenAlexaff
Hussein ElBadawi, Nader Albalkhi, Ibrahim Al Kadhim, Ahmed Elhadi Elsadig, Dimitrios Baltzis, Mohamed Hassan Hatahet, Mahmoud Ismail, Said Khader, Christina Louise Rasmussen, Stine H. Scheuer, Ahmed Shalaby, Mohammed Almehthel

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Obesity and Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNovo Nordisk
KeywordsSemaglutideType 2 diabetesPopulationDiabetes mellitusPatient satisfaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: PIONEER REAL Saudi Arabia investigated real-world clinical outcomes associated with the use of once-daily oral semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 34- to 44-week multicentre, prospective, open-label study in adults with T2D, who were treatment-naive to injectable glucose-lowering medication and initiated oral semaglutide in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to end of study (EoS) in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included changes in body weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC) from baseline to EoS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status (DTSQs) and change (DTSQc) tools. RESULTS: In total, 192 participants initiated oral semaglutide. At baseline, mean (standard deviation) age was 51.7 (10.91) years, mean HbA1c was 8.0% (1.51) and mean BW was 90.5 kg (15.68). In total, 139 participants completed the study. Estimated mean (standard error [SE]) changes (95% confidence interval) in HbA1c and BW were -1.0%-points (0.09; p < 0.0001) and -4.4 kg (0.51; p < 0.0001), respectively. Estimated mean (SE) change in WC was -4.3 cm (0.62; p < 0.0001). At EoS, 61.9% of participants had HbA1c levels <7%, with 21.9% and 17.1% achieving HbA1c reductions of ≥1% alongside BW reductions of ≥3% or ≥5%, respectively. Treatment satisfaction increased significantly (mean change in DTSQs +8.7 and DTSQc 14.9; both p < 0.0001). At EoS, 49.5% of participants remained on oral semaglutide, of whom 47.4% were receiving the 14.0 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world population of adults with T2D in Saudi Arabia experienced clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, increased treatment satisfaction and a favourable safety profile, consistent with previously published PIONEER REAL studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Obesity and MetabolismSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207