MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416773130 · doi:10.1002/hyp.70320

Characterising the Hydrology and Water Resources of a Regulated Cold‐Regions River Basin Using a Land Surface Hydrological Model

2025· article· en· W4416773130 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Fuad Yassin, Jefferson S. Wong, John W. Pomeroy, Alain Pietroniro, Bruce Davison

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersGlobal Water FuturesCanada First Research Excellence FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSnowmeltSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)StreamflowDrainage basinEvapotranspirationGlacierMeltwaterWater balance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The MESH hydrological model, driven by a 10 km meteorological reanalysis, was deployed to simulate the Saskatchewan River Basin (SRB), a 406 000 km 2 cold‐region basin in Western Canada with diverse climate zones and extensive human regulation. The model was validated using multi‐source observation and enabled detailed assessment of the basin's water balance components, runoff generation processes and irrigation impacts on hydrology. The model achieved Kling‐Gupta Efficiency values of 0.35–0.85 across 23 streamflow stations (2005–2016), indicating reliable capture of observed flow regimes and reservoir regulation effects. Simulated evapotranspiration correlated strongly with satellite estimates (GLEAM, r = 0.98), and the model realistically reproduced seasonal snowpack dynamics and GRACE‐derived water storage variations, with minor underestimation of peak snow water equivalent. Glacier diagnostics revealed that total runoff from glacier‐covered areas contributes ~2.9% of SRB's mean annual runoff, of which 0.75% is glacier ice melt. Glacier ice melt runoff contributions varied by sub‐basin, with the highest proportions from high‐elevation regions: 1.96% to the North Saskatchewan near Edmonton, 1.14% to the Bow near its mouth, 0.66% to the Oldman and 0.32% to the Red Deer. A negative glacier mass balance trend strongest in southern sub‐basins, signals declining ice reserves and the long‐term vulnerability of glacier‐fed water supplies. Diagnosis of runoff processes revealed significant variability in runoff generation, particularly in mountain headwaters and identified snowmelt as the dominant contributor, involved in 84.2% of runoff generation, broken down as snowmelt 43.4%, rain‐on‐snowmelt 10.2% and mixed events 30.6% of the SRB's annual runoff. Rainfall events contributed 15.8% and events with rainfall involved totalled 56.6% of annual runoff. This highlights the complexity of runoff generation processes in the SRB and the substantial role of snowmelt in sustaining the basin's hydrology. The impact of irrigation on evapotranspiration and streamflow was significant, with irrigation increasing mean annual evapotranspiration by 26.4% and reducing streamflow in key locations by up to 11%. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive and validated understanding of the SRB's hydrology and water resources, emphasising the influence of interactions between natural processes and human interventions. The insights from this research can inform water management strategies, particularly those aimed at adapting to future environmental changes. The findings underscore the importance of MESH as a robust tool for coupled hydrological and water resources modelling in managed, diverse, cold‐regions basins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207