MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416779871 · doi:10.1002/ana.78084

Late Pregnancy Antiseizure Medication Exposure and Offspring Neurodevelopmental Risk: A Multi‐Child Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4416779871 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Odile Sheehy, Vanina Tchuente, Sherif Eltonsy, Steven Hawken, Padma Kaul, Mark S. Walker, Michael Pugliese, Roxana Drăgan, Anamaria Savu, Lisiane Freitas Leal, Lucie Morin, Isabelle Malhamé, Raluca Pana, Anick Bérard

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalOntario Stroke NetworkUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of ManitobaOttawa HospitalManitoba HealthUniversity of OttawaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsOffspringPrenatal exposureCohort studyPregnancyCohortRetrospective cohort studyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Antiseizure medication (ASM) use during pregnancy has increased over the past decade. However, evidence linking prenatal ASM exposure to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in offspring remains inconsistent. This study evaluated whether prenatal ASM exposure increases the risk of NDDs in children. METHODS: We analyzed data from 5 population-based cohorts of live-born children in Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec; the Canadian Mother-Child Cohort [CAMCCO] cohorts) and the United States (AM-PREGNANT cohort). ASM exposure was defined as maternal prescription fills overlapping the 60 days before birth. NDDs were identified using validated algorithm based on the International Classification of Disease-9/10 codes from inpatient and outpatient records. Within each cohort, Cox proportional hazards models were applied, with adjustment performed separately using (1) covariates and (2) propensity scores. Pooled estimates were obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 2,910,206 children, 0.47% were exposed to ASMs in the 60 days before birth. Prenatal ASM exposure was associated with a 29% increased risk of NDDs (pooled-adjusted hazard ratio [p-aHR], 1.29; 95% CI: 1.22-1.37; 1,805 exposed cases). In the Canadian cohorts, risks of combined NDDs varied by medication: carbamazepine (p-aHR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.20-1.87; 262 exposed cases), clonazepam (p-aHR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.12-1.33; 585 exposed cases), topiramate (p-aHR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.04-2.34; 69 exposed cases), and valproic acid (p-aHR 1.38; 95% CI: 1.16-1.65; 134 exposed cases). Although point estimates were higher for polytherapy than monotherapy, the difference was not statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: Prenatal exposure to certain ASMs was consistently associated with increased risks of NDDs in offspring. These findings support careful, individualized decision-making regarding prenatal ASM use to minimize neurodevelopmental risks. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:761-776.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207