MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel Way of Generating Random Numbers Using Lucas Sequence and Associated in ATM/Ecommerce for Secured Online Transactions

2025· article· W4416785443 on OpenAlex
R. Elumalai, G. S. G. N. Anjaneyulu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVIT University
KeywordsPseudorandom number generatorHash functionSequence (biology)Random sequenceRandom number generationInteger (computer science)Finite fieldField (mathematics)Heuristic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes novel pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) based on the Lucas sequence and the SHA3-512 hashing algorithm over the finite field Fp. We introduce one primary algorithm capable of generating random numbers up to 32 digits (256 bits) in length, suitable for highly confidential applications such as international communications, defense activities, and large monetary transactions. Additionally, three associated sub-algorithms produce fixed-length random numbers of 4, 6, and 8 digits (32, 48, and 64 bits, respectively), optimized for ATM and e-commerce transactions. Unlike existing PRNGs that rely on a single seed, our approach utilizes two seeds: a userprovided, context-specific seed, and a server-generated seed derived from the Lucas sequence over the Pell curve. The server-generated seed remains entirely outside user control, enhancing the security of the generated random numbers. The PRNG process involves hashing the sum of solutions to the Pell curve, converting the resulting hexadecimal hash output into binary, and extracting the first half of the 512 bits, which is then mapped to an integer over the field Fq to produce the random number. Statistical analysis using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirms that the generated numbers follow a uniform distribution. Security analysis demonstrates resilience against various attacks, including direct cryptanalytic, input-based, iterative guessing, backtracking, and gap-filling attacks. These results suggest that the proposed PRNGs offer improved security and efficiency for applications in ATM operations and e-commerce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it