MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416786731

[Mental health service corridors between universities and health and social services institutions in Quebec: Persistent challenges and potential solutions].

2025· article· fr· W4416786731 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julie Lane, Juliette St-Onge, Anne-Marie Auger, Bruno Collard, Ariane Girard, Jean‐Daniel Carrier, François Lauzier‐Jobin, Andrée-Anne Légaré, Marie-Ève Poitras, Marie-Ève Fortier, Lara Maillet, Magaly Brodeur

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration PubliqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthService (business)Action planPlan (archaeology)PopulationThematic analysisFlourishingHealth services
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mental health of Quebec's student population appears to have been deteriorating for several years. Faced with these challenges, the ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur in Quebec has developed the Action plan on student mental health in higher education, which aims to support higher education institutions in implementing practices and measures that can contribute to the well-being and development of a flourishing mental health of the student population. The plan calls for the creation of service corridors between institutions and the health and social services network (HSSN). A number of other ministerial orientations also call for this approach. At present, information on these corridors remains limited, and they do not appear to be the subject of research anywhere in the world, particularly in Quebec. Objective The aim of this article is to document the state of service corridors between universities and the HSSN in Quebec. Method The data at the heart of this article comes from an inventory produced by 17 universities. A thematic analysis of the data was carried out using a deductive and inductive approach, with the aid of N'Vivo software. Results Five themes emerged from the analysis: 1) Issues related to current service corridors between universities and the HSSN; 2) Consequences of the absence of service corridors for students; 3) Consequences of the absence of service corridors for universities; 4) Main factors that could hinder the implementation of service corridors; 5) Proposed solutions. Conclusion Anticipated impact: This article highlights the absence of service corridors between universities and the HSSN, despite the many efforts made to create them and the ministerial orientations that encourage their creation. The article proposes a number of very concrete and actionable solutions that are perfectly aligned with ministerial orientations and that would help reduce emergency room use in Quebec. First priority could be given to students in need of specialized services who must be referred to the HSSN. The use of the mental health access mechanism, present in the HSSN, appears to be the simplest and most coherent approach, given that this mechanism aims to improve access to specific and specialized mental health care and services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→