MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416789806 · doi:10.1111/jsap.70056

Severe duodenal entrapment secondary to omental adhesion in a Labrador retriever

2025· article· en· W4416789806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Doeven, Scott Barker, Laura Cole, Floryne O. Buishand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Small Animal Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOmental and Epiploic Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuodenumAdhesionAbdomenStomachPylorusPortal venous systemAbdominal ultrasonographyRight gastric veinLabrador Retriever

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nine-year-old male neutered Labrador presented with an acute history of regurgitation, vomiting and lethargy. The dog had a previous diagnosis of chronic inflammatory enteropathy for which he was receiving 0.8 mg/kg prednisolone PO once a day, alongside elevation of liver enzymes of unknown relevance/cause. At presentation, haematology was unremarkable and biochemistry revealed ongoing elevation of liver enzymes (ALT 239 U/L, ALP 302 U/L). Abdominal radiographs were taken, showing a slightly gas-distended stomach in the left cranial abdomen (Fig 1A). The right lateral projection demonstrated continuation between the partially gas-distended pylorus into a markedly distended loop of duodenum and a second mid-abdominal loop (Fig 1A). The remaining small intestines were considered within normal limits. These changes were suggestive of a proximal small intestinal mechanical obstruction. The primary differentials were mesenteric rent, torsion, stricture or obstructive intestinal disease. The dog had no prior history of abdominal surgery. An exploratory coeliotomy revealed marked duodenal dilation, with the omentum covering the duodenum upon entry. The liver was generally enlarged with a roughened surface. The duodenum was entrapped within an enclosure created by an omental adhesion to the caudate process of the caudate liver lobe (Fig 1C), with the entrapped duodenum accounting for both distended loops visible on the radiographs. No torsion, nor discolouration of the entrapped intestine was present. The adhesion was broken down with electrocautery and the duodenum released. Some dilation was relieved via passing of a orogastric tube. Complete decompression was not possible, which was due to luminal contents blocking the needle hub, or the marked distension making manipulation of the gaseous contents challenging. The dog recovered uneventfully. Despite the novelty of this case, it reiterates the diagnostic utility of radiographs for diagnosing gastrointestinal obstruction when considering an exploratory celiotomy. L. F. Doeven drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to the management of the case and revising of the manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Small Animal PracticeSame topicOmental and Epiploic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207