MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416792055 · doi:10.1002/aenm.202505385

Interfacial Electric Field Sharping by Non‐Ionic Halogens Enables Selective CO <sub>2</sub> ‐to C <sub>2+</sub> Electroreduction

2025· article· en· W4416792055 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Zhou, Dongge Wang, Ying Wang, Jing Xu, Yao Wang, Ying Zhang, Chengsi Pan, Bingling He, Yang Lou, Hongwen Huang, Jiawei Zhang, Yongfa Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Energy Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHalideHalogenElectric fieldElectrochemistryIonic bondingMoleculeCoupling (piping)Faraday efficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Halide ions are widely employed to accelerate the electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR), but their practical application is hampered by site blocking and electrode corrosion. Here we present an organic‐inorganic hybrid (OIH) strategy that embeds non‐ionic halogenated molecules (C 8 H 17 X, X = Cl, Br, I) into the Cu 2 O matrix to shape interfacial electric fields. This design preserves the kinetic benefits of halides while eliminating instability from ionic incorporation. The optimized C 8 H 17 Cl‐Cu 2 O OIHs delivers an outstanding C 2+ Faradaic efficiency of 80.6% with a partial current density of 161.2 mA cm −2 . Spectroscopic and theoretical analyses reveal that non‐ionic halogens act as molecular “field shapers,” generating strong interfacial electric fields that strengthen *CO adsorption and balance atop/bridge configurations. This tailored *CO landscape promotes efficient C–C coupling by simultaneously increasing coverage and dimerization kinetics. Our findings establish non‐ionic halogen modifiers as a robust platform for stabilizing and steering interfacial electric fields in CO 2 RR, offering a general strategy for designing selective and durable electrocatalysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Energy MaterialsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207