Event-related evoked potential P300 in children: reference values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose To measure and compare P300 latency and amplitude in normal hearing children at different age groups. Methods A cross-sectional study with 96 children aged between 8 and 11 years and 11 months, equally divided into four age-based groups. P300 assessment was conducted using the Masbe ATC Plus equipment (Contronic®), with 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz stimuli, at an 80/20% probability. Results The mean P300 latency and amplitude values were 339.57 ± 41.03 and 18.22 ± 7.59 in G1, 327.94 ± 37.29 and 16.32 ± 7.01 in G2, 321.05 ± 31.84 and 15.86 ± 5.08 in G3, and 310.76 ± 28.99 and 11.24 ± 3.12 in G4, respectively. Conclusion All children presented P300. There were no differences regarding P300 latencies and amplitudes when comparing different age groups in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".