MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416795082 · doi:10.1016/j.bas.2025.105889

Spinal manifestations of Paget's disease: Case presentation and systematic review

2025· article· en· W4416795082 on OpenAlexaff
Abdullah T. Eissa, Karlo M. Pedro, Andrew Gao, Michael G. Fehlings

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Spine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Differential diagnosisSynovial cystFacet (psychology)Synovial jointMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Paget's disease of the bone (PDB) is a chronic disorder characterized by abnormal bone remodeling, often involving the spine. Although spinal stenosis and neural compression are well-documented manifestations, facet joint synovial cysts in PDB are extremely rare, and their development remains unclear. Research question: We report the case of a PDB patient who presented with progressive radicular symptoms due to an enlarged L1-L2 cyst with marked facet hypertrophy and stenosis. Materials and methods: We presented a case of a patient who underwent surgical decompression along with cyst excision, during which a thick-walled, hemorrhagic cyst compressing neural structures was identified. Postoperative neurological function exhibited enhancement. To compare with this case, we performed a systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines regarding spinal complications associated with PDB, encompassing ten articles and a cumulative total of 87 patients. Results: The most frequently reported manifestations included spinal stenosis, vertebral fracture, spinal cord compression, cauda equina syndrome, and neurological deficits. The literature only referred to one reported case of synovial cyst in relation to PDB. Discussions and conclusion: This article and case highlight that, while uncommon, facet joint synovial cysts belong in the correct differential diagnosis of the spinal manifestations of PDB, particularly when there is neural compression. Impeccable imaging and customized surgical planning are significant in the management of such complex cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and SpineSame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207