Hellenistic Poetry in Translation by Brazilian Women: A Yet Untrodden Path
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Embora os estudos de poesia helenística tenham crescido no país desde o começo do século, seguindo tendências globais de crescimento e interesse em determinados temas de pesquisa, ainda são poucas as traduções publicadas em livro e a grande maioria delas é feita por pesquisadores homens. Pesquisa bibliográfica usando bases de dados de dissertações e teses mostra que há mais traduções de pesquisadoras mulheres no âmbito da produção acadêmica e elas tendem a integrar seus trabalhos de mestrado e doutorado. Entretanto, esses trabalhos raramente se tornam livros publicados, permanecendo inertes nos repositórios de acesso livre de universidades. Dessa maneira, os objetivos deste artigo são descrever e analisar a disparidade de gênero encontrada nas traduções de poesia helenística publicadas em formato de livro e propor ações para diminuir a assimetria de gênero na tradução de textos clássicos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".