The 'Mental Health Crisis' and the Nonbeing of the Mad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article offers a critical theoretical analysis of the ontological dimension of madness, challenging dominant narratives that frame contemporary mental health discourse as a 'crisis'. Rather than focusing on the neoliberal or economic conditions under which this crisis is declared, we interrogate the symbolic and ontological structures that delineate who is considered sane and who is constructed ased mad. Our central claim is that Western symbolic systems produce categories of unintelligibility; that is, 'non-beings' who are excluded from the domain of being human. These classificatory binaries (human/nonhuman, rational/irrational, sane/insane) are not neutral descriptors, but constitutive symbolic orders that shape the very possibility of human relations. Drawing on Judith Butler's theory of subject formation, we argue that the subject emerges only through normative language into which one is born, not chosen. This entry into the speakable requires differentiation from the unspeakable, echoing Descartes's foundational opposition between reason and madness. Madness in this schema is not merely a factor of exclusion, but functions as the necessary condition for defining rational subjectivity. The unintelligible subject, foreclosed from language, inhabits what Julia Kristeva terms the realm of the abject: a space of exclusion that is continually reproduced through performative acts of subject formation. This ontological foreclosure is not a historical anomaly, but a persistent feature of Western philosophical thought. By exposing how symbolic violence is embedded in the very structures that define subjectivity, we argue that the violence against those deemed mad is not incidental but systemic. The article concludes that efforts to 'humanise' the psychiatric and criminal justice systems are moot if they do not disrupt the root cause of the problem: that Mad persons-similar to Black, Indigenous, Trans, and Queer persons, among others-are not considered worthy of humanity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".