MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416806978 · doi:10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101395

Resident-led action for greener operating rooms: a pilot using the national perioperative sustainability scorecard

2025· article· en· W4416806978 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon M. Best, Olivia Cheng‐Boivin, Connor T. A. Brenna, Phil Williams, Ishita Aggarwal, Owen Dan Luo, Nicole Simms, Sarah Ward, Anita Rao, M. Ho, Husein Moloo, Mary Hanna, D. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalanced scorecardSustainabilityAction (physics)PerioperativeAction research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Environmental determinants such as air pollution and extreme heat contribute to approximately 13 million preventable deaths globally every year. Paradoxically, the health-care sector itself considerably affects planetary health, with operating rooms accounting for 10–20% of hospital-related greenhouse gas emissions. In response, the Sustainable Health Systems Community of Practice developed a sustainability scorecard, later adapted into the national Sustainable Perioperative Care Scorecard by the CASCADES initiative. This tool outlines 13 evidence-based targets to guide sustainable practices in perioperative care. This quality improvement pilot project aimed to show the utility of this national, freely available scorecard in a resident-led assessment of perioperative sustainability practices. Methods Residents partnered with staff surgeons to apply the 2023 CASCADES Sustainable Perioperative Care Scorecard across two major academic institutions. Assessments covered domains such as sustainability leadership, anaesthetic gas usage, reduction of low-value care, reusable instrument adoption, and waste segregation. Findings Both institutions showed strong engagement with resident-led evaluations. Scorecard results could distinguish differences and opportunities in practice between the two sites. Both hospitals scored well on elements relating to limiting low-value care, minimising intraoperative fresh gas flows, and implementing reusable anaesthesia equipment, and several opportunities for improvement were identified. Interpretation This pilot project illustrates the practicality of a national scorecard for evaluating perioperative sustainability and underscores the important role of residents in leading climate-conscious health-care improvements. Engaging trainees in structured assessments can accelerate institutional efforts towards more sustainable perioperative practices. Funding None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207