Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with interstitial lung disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) typically adheres to a sequence of therapeutic protocols & accordFtaing to assessment procedures. Efforts should focus on alleviating symptoms, incorporating treatments such as pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and psychosocial support to improve patient well-being. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on symptoms, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease. Methods This Prospective interventional pre-post study was done on 60 ILD patients aged ≥ 18 years old, in both sexes. All patients were subjected to complete history taking, McGill QOL Questionnaire, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, dyspnea assessment using the modified Medical Research Council scale, BMI, six-minute walk test, spirometry, oxygen saturation and ABG, echocardiography, and high-resolution CT chest. Participants underwent a supervised PR program (2 sessions/week for 8 weeks) following ATS/ERS guidelines, including: Health education (20 min) [Medication education, exacerbation review, and rehabilitation importance], exercise training [Warm-up (5–10 min), endurance training, resistance training, respiratory muscle training, and cool-down (5–10 min)], and evaluation of peripheral and respiratory muscle strength. Results Spirometry results showed a significant increase in FVC ( p = 0.04), indicating improved lung capacity. Psychological well-being, as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), improved significantly, with scores decreasing ( p = 0.004). Additionally, the MQOL total score increased markedly ( p < 0.001), reflecting a significant enhancement in perceived quality of life. The categorical distribution of MQOL also showed significant improvement ( p < 0.001). According to Comparison between pre- and post-program measurements showed statistically significant differences in mMRC dyspnea scale, heart rate, and O₂ saturation ( P = 0.001 for all). Conclusions PR in patients with interstitial lung diseases demonstrated significant benefits, including alleviation of dyspnea, improvement of exercise capacity and aerobic performance, enhancement of quality of life and psychological well-being, as well as gains in respiratory mechanics and peripheral muscle strength and endurance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".