MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GUI-based hybrid ML model for predicting ultimate strength of FRP-confined UHPC with CTGAN-augmented data

2025· article· en· W4416808977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComposite Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsGovernment of ManitobaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsHyperparameterFeature (linguistics)Artificial neural networkPerformance predictionExperimental dataCorrelation coefficientRidgeRegressionMean squared error

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-confined ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is a promising form for advanced structural applications because of its superior mechanical performance and resilience. Meanwhile, consistent prediction models for the ultimate strength of FRP-confined UHPC stays limited, specifically due to the scarcity of sufficient experimental data. Hence, the current study proposes innovative machine learning (ML)-based framework that combines a conditional tabular generative adversarial network (CTGAN) with Optuna, a cutting-edge hyperparameter optimization algorithm, to address limitations of datasets and improve model generality. A processed experimental data consisting of 145 FRP-confined UHPC samples was assembled from the literature and utilized to train the model. Using the augmented dataset, a stacked hybrid ML model integrating multiple algorithms with ridge regression as the meta -learner was developed. The proposed model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to individual ML models, achieving a correlation coefficient of 0.984 along with consistently low performance error metric. SHAP analysis shown that feature hierarchies between original and augmented datasets were strongly correlated, confirming that CTGAN preserved the input–output relationships. Furthermore, the leave-one-study-out validation demonstrated robust cross-study generalization, with CTGAN-generated data achieving error levels comparable to experimental datasets. Finally, a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) was developed for structural design applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it