MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416811914 · doi:10.1186/s13037-025-00464-w

Unintentionally retained surgical gauze presenting as chronic infected fistula to the surgical wound: a report of two cases

2025· article· en· W4416811914 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Fadhili Bake, Justin Kambale Tsandiraki, Céline Kavira Malengera, Fabrice Gulimwentuga Cikomola, Zacharie Tsongo Kibendelwa, Dan Poenaru

Bibliographic record

VenuePatient Safety in Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemostasis and retained surgical items
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGossypibomaLaparotomyFistulaForeign bodyEnterocutaneous fistulaForeign BodiesSurgical wound

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Retained foreign objects represent a critical yet preventable failure in surgical safety systems worldwide, reflecting systemic weaknesses that threaten patient outcomes. Persistent postoperative fistulae are a potential clinical marker of such retained foreign objects, but they are often underrecognized, particularly in resource-limited settings. By reporting these cases, we aim to underscore the diagnostic value of wound fistulae as a sentinel sign of retained foreign objects and to highlight the ongoing gaps in surgical safety systems. CASE PRESENTATION: Two African females presented with chronic, non-healing wounds accompanied by persistent fistulous discharge following previous surgical procedures. The first patient, 46-year-old, experienced abdominal pain and ongoing wound discharge that persisted for five months after undergoing a hysterectomy. Diagnostic imaging identified a retained abdominal pack which had migrated into the bowel, resulting in both an enterocutaneous fistula and an interloop fistula. Accordingly, a revision laparotomy was performed four days post-presentation, entailing the removal of the retained abdominal pack along with segmental resection of the ileum followed by primary anastomosis. The second patient, 45-year-old, presented with persistent drainage from a neck wound six months after thyroidectomy, notwithstanding several unsuccessful wound explorations. Operative exploration carried out two days after presentation revealed retained gauze within a fistulous tract. In both instances, surgical extraction of the retained foreign objects led to complete resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: These cases expose the systemic deficiencies in operative safety that permit the occurrence of retained foreign objects, leading to severe patient harm and prolonged morbidity. They highlight the urgent need to reinforce surgical safety culture, ensure strict compliance with established checklists, and implement reliable detection protocols. Addressing these systemic gaps is essential to prevent such avoidable complications and improve patient safety outcomes globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePatient Safety in SurgerySame topicHemostasis and retained surgical itemsFrench-language works237,207