All providers Better Communication Skills (ABCs) program: protocol for a randomized controlled trial assessing communication training effectiveness with interprofessional clinicians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-quality person-centred communication for those living with serious illness benefits patients, families, and health care professionals (HCPs). However, research suggests that HCPs often find it challenging to engage in these discussions. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the 'All providers Better Communication Skills' (ABCs), an online blended learning program delivered over three months. The ABCs program seeks to complement existing programs by adopting an interprofessional and person-centred educational philosophy, teaching core communication skills that can be utilized by any clinician across many conversations and healthcare settings, and investigating outcomes focused on clinician's skill acquisition and behavior change. METHODS: We will conduct a Canada-wide prospective stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial with interprofessional HCPs. All participants will receive the intervention, however, there will be a delay in the intervention for those randomly assigned to the control group. Our study will measure change in pre and post intervention scores for all participants. The primary outcome consists of external expert rater assessments of participants' video-recorded Standardized Patient (SP) encounters using the validated Assessment of Clinical Encounters - Communication Tool. Secondary outcomes include: participant self-assessments on self-efficacy using the validated Self-Efficacy-12 measure, as well as competence using the Patient and Family-Centered Communication subscale from the validated End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey; and SP ratings using the validated Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction and Feeling Heard and Understood measures. Learning experience and perceived usability of the program will also be assessed through the validated Blended Learning Usability Evaluation - Questionnaire and semi-structured interviews following program completion. DISCUSSION: This study is a national trial evaluating the effectiveness of a communication program for interprofessional HCPs. This research will generate evidence on ways of improving conversations about serious illness. With improved communication skills, clinicians can better support patients and families in their illness understanding, deliver care that better aligns with their patients' goals and values, improve care-related outcomes and experiences, and optimize healthcare resources - all of which can support health system strengthening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06606470 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".