MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416817635 · doi:10.1002/epi4.70184

Late‐onset unexplained epilepsy as a risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia: Protocol for a multi‐center prospective longitudinal observational study ( <scp>ELUCID</scp> )

2025· article· en· W4416817635 on OpenAlex
Alice Lam, Emily L. Johnson, Rani A. Sarkis, Leah J. Blank, Tyler E. Gaston, Mouhsin M. Shafi, Rodrigo Zepeda, Kyle R. Pellerin, Nathalie Jetté, Douglas N. Greve, Lori B. Chibnik, Rebecca E. Amariglio, Gad A. Marshall, M. Brandon Westover

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsObservational studyDementiaEpilepsyRisk factorPopulationCognitive impairmentCognitionProtocol (science)Electroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Late-onset unexplained epilepsy (LoUE), defined as epilepsy onset after age 55 without an obvious cause, is an important risk factor for dementia. Studies have shown that 10%-25% of individuals with LoUE develop dementia within 3-4 years following their first seizure. However, the mechanisms underlying progression from LoUE to dementia remain poorly understood. The goals of the ELUCID study are to identify risk factors associated with the development of cognitive decline and dementia in LoUE and to develop tools to identify patients at a high risk for these outcomes and thereby establish a foundation for dementia prevention strategies in this population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ELUCID is a multi-center prospective longitudinal observational study that will enroll 600 participants aged 55 or older with LoUE across seven U.S. medical centers. Participants will undergo a baseline evaluation that includes a detailed clinical history, cognitive testing, brain MRI, overnight scalp EEG, and blood biomarkers. Participants will be followed at 6-month intervals for up to 5 years, to record cognitive and neurological changes, with the primary outcomes of interest being the development of mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia. This study aims to establish LoUE disease subtypes based on biomarkers, cognitive trajectories, and imaging features and to develop a risk stratification tool for predicting cognitive decline and dementia in patients presenting with LoUE. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: ELUCID has obtained IRB approval (no. 2023P001566, August 2023), with the Mass General Brigham IRB serving as the single IRB of record. All de-identified study data will be made publicly available on completion of the study. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The ELUCID study is a research project involving several medical centers across the U.S. It will focus on older adults who have recently developed seizures without a clear cause. Participants undergo an initial evaluation that includes questions about their medical history, a brain MRI, an overnight scalp EEG (brain wave study), and a blood draw. They will be followed over time with health questionnaires and yearly tests of memory and thinking. The purpose of the study is to learn what factors increase the risk of dementia in this population and to develop tools to predict which individuals are at the highest risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it