Teachers' Perspectives on the Role of Play Activities in Enhancing the Socioemotional Development of Children in Private Kindergartens in Kuala Selangor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to identify teachers’ perspectives on the role of play activities in enhancing the socioemotional development of children in private kindergartens around Kuala Selangor. The objectives of this study are to determine teachers’ perceptions of the importance of play activities in children's socioemotional development, to analyze the types of play activities that can help improve socioemotional skills, and to assess the extent to which play activities contribute to such development. This study employed a quantitative approach using a questionnaire instrument based on the Likert Scale and involved 80 respondents. Section B (play activities) consisted of 10 items, while Section C (socioemotional development) comprised 5 social items and 5 emotional items. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. The findings revealed a significant positive relationship between play activities and the socioemotional development of children. Play activities were found to play an important role in supporting development. This study provides significant implications for teachers, students, researchers, and the field of Early Childhood Education. It is recommended that further research be conducted to explore the role of play activities in other areas of development, such as children's physical development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it