MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416827696 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v14n4p1

The Extended H Theorem and the Extended Entropy

2025· article· W4416827696 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tsung‐Wu Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntropy (arrow of time)H-theoremMaxwell–Boltzmann distributionMaximum entropy probability distributionEntropy rateJoint quantum entropyDistribution functionMin entropyMaximum entropy thermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces an extension of the H theorem to an arbitrary order d ≥1 . The extended H theorem defines the extended entropy Hd  for a given distribution and identifies the distribution function f_d(v) that maximizes entropy H_d . When d=1,  H_1  corresponds to the original entropy defined by Boltzmann, and the distribution that maximizes it is the Boltzmann distribution. For d=2 , the maximizing distribution is the Rayleigh distribution. For d=3 , the maximizing distribution is the Maxwell distribution. Therefore, in the three-dimensional physical world, the correct speed distribution of gas particles is the Maxwell distribution, which maximizes the extended entropy H_3  rather than the original entropy H_1 . The result distribution f_d(v)  that maximizes the extended entropy H_d  for any d≥1  is derived and applied to gases that include rotational and strain energy in addition to translational energy. Numerical validation supporting these findings is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicStatistical Mechanics and EntropyFrench-language works237,207