New Insights: P.I.G in Preterm Infants With Isolated PDA and Severe Pulmonary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a case of a premature infant who had a persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and subsequently developed severe pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and respiratory failure. A lung biopsy was performed during PDA ligation, revealing a consistent thickening of the interstitial tissue. The biopsy also showed the presence of immature interstitial cells containing high amounts of cytoplasmic glycogen, indicative of pulmonary interstitial glycogenosis (P.I.G). There was no conclusive evidence of maturational arrest, infection, alveolar proteinosis, or alveolar capillary dysplasia. While the association between P.I.G and PHT has been documented in case reports involving children with congenital heart disease (CHD), the majority of these cases involved full-term infants and older children. Notably, there have been no reports on the diagnosis of P.I.G in infants with isolated PDA, without any other congenital heart conditions. This expands the existing knowledge of P.I.G, highlighting the diagnostic value of lung biopsy in premature infants with long-standing PDA and severe PHT exhibiting similar characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".