Intervensi Berbasis Self-Efficacy dan Spiritualitas: Implikasi Praktis Pencegahan Quarter Life Crisis di Kalangan Mahasiswa Kesehatan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify the relationship between Self-Efficacy, spirituality, and Quarter Life Crisis (QLC) among final-year health students at STIKES Banyuwangi. Methods: A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional correlational design was employed. The study involved 43 final-year students experiencing QLC from a population of 79. Data were collected using the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Spiritual Well-Being Scale, and a QLC questionnaire, then analyzed using Rank Spearman correlation. Results: Most students (60.5%) managed QLC at a "good" level. A significant negative correlation was found between Self-Efficacy and QLC (r=0.548, p<0.01), and between spirituality and QLC (r=0.646, p<0.01). This indicates that higher Self-Efficacy and spirituality are associated with lower QLC levels. Conclusion: Self-Efficacy and spirituality are crucial protective factors against QLC in final-year health students. These findings suggest the importance of interventions focused on enhancing Self-Efficacy and spiritual well-being to support students' psychological welfare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it