Intervensi Berbasis Self-Efficacy dan Spiritualitas: Implikasi Praktis Pencegahan Quarter Life Crisis di Kalangan Mahasiswa Kesehatan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify the relationship between Self-Efficacy, spirituality, and Quarter Life Crisis (QLC) among final-year health students at STIKES Banyuwangi. Methods: A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional correlational design was employed. The study involved 43 final-year students experiencing QLC from a population of 79. Data were collected using the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Spiritual Well-Being Scale, and a QLC questionnaire, then analyzed using Rank Spearman correlation. Results: Most students (60.5%) managed QLC at a "good" level. A significant negative correlation was found between Self-Efficacy and QLC (r=0.548, p<0.01), and between spirituality and QLC (r=0.646, p<0.01). This indicates that higher Self-Efficacy and spirituality are associated with lower QLC levels. Conclusion: Self-Efficacy and spirituality are crucial protective factors against QLC in final-year health students. These findings suggest the importance of interventions focused on enhancing Self-Efficacy and spiritual well-being to support students' psychological welfare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".