MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416839158 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1680317

Circulating cell adhesion molecules as biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4416839158 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Krzysztof Przęczek, Dorota Cibor, Małgorzata Zwolińska-Wcisło, Danuta Owczarek

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell adhesion moleculeInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammationCell adhesionInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdhesionBiomarkerCirculating tumor cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Endothelial dysfunction is a recognized component of the pathogenesis and clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Measurement of soluble forms of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) may reflect the extent of endothelial injury and serve as potential biomarkers of disease activity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (sMAdCAM-1), and selectins (sE-selectin, sP-selectin, and sL-selectin) in patients with IBD and healthy controls, or in comparable IBD subgroups defined by disease activity or type. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to June 15, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with healthy controls, patients with IBD showed higher levels of sICAM-1 (SMD 1.38, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.25, p=0.002) and sE-selectin (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.61, p=0.008). In subgroup analyses, this association persisted for sICAM-1 in both Crohn's disease (CD) (SMD 1.89, 95% CI 0.15 to 3.62, p=0.033) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (SMD 0.95, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.64, p=0.008), and for sE-selectin only in CD (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.82, p=0.032). When comparing active and inactive disease, higher sICAM-1 levels were observed in the active group (SMD 0.75, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.12, p<0.001), while no significant differences were found for other CAMs. No differences in levels of these molecules were observed between CD and UC. Conclusions: Circulating CAMs, particularly sICAM-1 and sE-selectin, are elevated in IBD patients, supporting a role of endothelial injury in disease pathogenesis. Among these, sICAM-1 shows potential as a biomarker for distinguishing active from inactive disease. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251088622.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.021
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207