MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416840131 · doi:10.2147/tcrm.s522244

Modified Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of Contrast Extravasation on Dual-Energy CT Predicts Haemorrhagic Transformation and Poor Outcome After Endovascular Thrombectomy

2025· article· en· W4416840131 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xinyi Chen, Jie Xu, Sheng Zhang, Shunyuan Guo, Huiyuan Wang, Yafei Shang, Panpan Shen, Jiawei Ye, Yu Geng

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtravasationContrast (vision)Stroke (engine)Computed tomographyTransformation (genetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Haemorrhagic transformation (HT) is an unpredictable complication of acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and imaging parameters that are correlated with haemorrhage are unknown. We developed a modified version of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) by adding a periventricular region to assess cerebral contrast extravasation (CE) on dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and assessed its predictive value for HT. Methods: In total, 101 patients who underwent DECT immediately after EVT were prospectively enrolled. CE was defined as incident hyperdensity on iodine overlay maps. We quantified the CT attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) and iodine concentration within the CE regions. The modified ASPECTS divided the middle cerebral artery vascular territory into 11 regions and added one region (paraventricular) to the original score. CE was scored as 1 point for each region, and the cumulative score was determined. Follow-up imaging was performed within 7 days postoperatively to confirm the occurrence of HT. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the predictive value of various DECT-measured parameters for HT. Results: Overall, 75/101 (74.3%) patients exhibited CE following EVT, and 47/101 (46.5%) patients exhibited HT. In the ROC curve analysis, the DECT parameter with the maximal area under the curve (AUC) for HT was the modified ASPECTS (AUC=0.87), indicating that patients with a modified ASPECTS >2 were more likely to develop HT (sensitivity: 83.0%, specificity: 83.3%). The maximum iodine concentration (AUC=0.76) and maximum CT attenuation (AUC=0.68) in the hyperdense region were also predictors of postoperative HT. Conclusion: The modified ASPECTS is a practical and sensitive method for assessing postoperative HT risk in patients following EVT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutics and Clinical Risk ManagementSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207