The crystal structures of methoxmetamine hydrochloride and methoxetamine hydrochloride determined from laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data contained in the Powder Diffraction File <sup>™</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The crystal structures of two arylcyclohexylamine derivatives – methoxmetamine·HCl (2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexan-1-one hydrochloride, MMXE·HCl) and methoxetamine·HCl (2-(ethylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexan-1-one hydrochloride, MXE·HCl) – have been determined using laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data contained in the Powder Diffraction File ™ . MMXE·HCl and MXE·HCl exhibit anesthetic and sedative effects and have been illicitly used as recreational drugs due to their dissociative hallucinogenic and euphoriant effects. The structure determination of MMXE·HCl and MXE·HCl was carried out with DASH, and the Rietveld refinements were performed with TOPAS Academic in monoclinic unit cells. The parameters obtained for MMXE·HCl were a = 15.0429(5) Å, b = 14.0721(5) Å, c = 6.5716(2) Å, β = 90.9864(14)°, and V = 1,390.91(8) Å 3 , with Z = 4 and space group P 2 1 / n. The parameters obtained for MXE·HCl were a = 8.7772(5) Å, b = 9.9528(7) Å, c = 8.5841(6) Å, β = 100.276(3)°, and V = 737.86(8) Å 3 , with Z = 2 and space group P 2 1 . The structures were validated by dispersion-corrected DFT calculations. Hirshfeld surface analysis and fingerprint plots calculations are also reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".