MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416843226 · doi:10.1002/wsb.1644

Current understanding of lymphoproliferative disease virus in wild turkeys

2025· article· en· W4416843226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chloe C. Goodwin, Andrew B. Allison, Mark G. Ruder, Justin D. Brown, Michael J. Chamberlain, Melanie R. Kunkel, Kevin D. Niedringhaus, Alisia A. W. Weyna, Charlie S. Bahnson, Elizabeth J. Elsmo, M. Kevin Keel, Heather Fenton, Kayla G. Adcock, Rebecca L. Poulson, Nicole M. Nemeth

Bibliographic record

VenueWildlife Society Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
KeywordsPopulationTransmission (telecommunications)Polymerase chain reactionDiseaseVirusPrevalenceLymphoproliferative disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lymphoproliferative disease virus (LPDV) has been detected in healthy and moribund wild turkeys ( Meleagris gallopavo ) throughout the United States and Canada. High LPDV prevalence paired with regional population declines in wild turkeys have generated interest in investigating its potential effects on population health. Progress has been made in elucidating pathogenesis, determining spatiotemporal patterns of infected wild turkeys, and developing diagnostic tests since initial LPDV documentation in the United States in 2009. While infection generally does not lead to outward signs of disease, it can cause widespread tumors in skin and internal organs. We reviewed literature on LPDV in domestic and wild turkeys to consolidate our current understanding of LPDV. Estimated LPDV prevalence among wild turkeys ranges from 26‐83% and varies by region, landscape, and season. Surveillance has revealed the largest prevalence in the northeastern and southeastern United States and central Canada, with detections west to Idaho, USA. Detection of LPDV is most frequently in adult female wild turkeys. Whole blood, bone marrow, and tumors are the most sensitive samples for diagnostic testing; however, LPDV has been detected in dried blood spots, plasma, oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs, and numerous tissues via polymerase chain reaction. In experimentally infected domestic turkeys with North American LPDV strains from wild turkeys, LPDV was detected in blood as early as 7 days post‐inoculation and transiently for up to 3 months. Further, domestic turkeys can develop clinical disease as early as 35 days post‐inoculation. Although LPDV can spread from turkey‐to‐turkey, the predominant natural route(s) of transmission is unclear. Additional diagnostic tools to distinguish LPDV lesions from other potential causes are in development. Despite the growing body of research, further work is needed to clarify aspects of epidemiology and potential effects of LPDV on wild turkey reproductive fitness, immune health, and behavior to assess potential population‐level effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWildlife Society BulletinSame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207