MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416851275 · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08996-3

Efficacy of core muscle strengthening training around the knee compared to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in early-stage knee osteoarthritis patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4416851275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiang Wang, Yizhe Xiong, Wuwei Song, Xiaoyu Guo, Jiacheng Yu, Wenyu Jiang, Yuhao Zhao, Zhenlin Yang, Rui Huang, Yongkang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology CommissionScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialOsteoarthritisNonsteroidalProtocol (science)Clinical trialCore (optical fiber)Traditional Chinese medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent condition characterized by a high incidence and disability rate, making early intervention particularly critical. It is essential to focus on addressing the underlying disease rather than solely alleviating symptoms through pharmacological treatments. The Osteoarthritis Research Society International recommends non-pharmacological therapies as the primary intervention strategy, with physical therapy identified as the principal method. Current rehabilitation training programs often present challenges, including prolonged treatment durations, complex procedures, and the necessity for medical supervision. Preliminary clinical observations suggest that core muscle strengthening training around the knee (CMSTK) may effectively reduce pain, enhance mobility, improve quality of life, and avoid the aforementioned limitations. Nevertheless, further high-quality research with larger sample sizes is required to validate its efficacy conclusively. This study aims to investigate the specific effectiveness of CMSTK for the treatment of EKOA. METHODS: This study is a 12-week single-blind non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. One hundred early-stage knee osteoarthritis (EKOA) patients will be recruited and randomly divided into CMSTK group and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs group. The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and secondary outcomes involves VAS, SF-36, ROM, and isometric strength. They will be conducted before allocation and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after allocation. Comprehensive efficacy will be evaluated by WOMAC. Data collectors and statisticians will be blinded, and participants will be asked not to reveal their allocation to assessors. DISCUSSION: The findings of this research will enhance the therapeutic approaches for early intervention in KOA, offer a scientific foundation for enabling patients with EKOA to engage in self-directed exercise, and contribute to the alleviation of social, medical, and economic burdens associated with the condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2400089758. Prospectively registered on 14 September 2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.009
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207