Human-Camelid Interactions in the Wari Hinterlands: A stable isotopic analysis of camelid remains from Auquimarca (600-1000 CE), Huancayo, Peru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Human-camelid interactions and pastoral practices have shaped social, political, and economic lifeways throughout the history of the Central Andes. However, how camelids were managed in the central highlands during the Middle Horizon (600-1000 CE), and how those strategies reflect negotiations between Andean vertical ecologies, local communities, and the expanding Wari sphere, remain unclear. This study employed a life history approach using sequential camelid enamel samples to analyze stable carbon and oxygen isotope ratios. The camelids were recovered from Auquimarca, a highland mortuary site in the Mantaro River Valley, Junín, Peru. Isotopic results are contextualized with archaeological evidence to examine the role camelids had in local subsistence strategies amid regional Wari imperial influence. δ 13 C and δ 18 O analysis of 32 camelid individuals (n=235 enamel carbonate samples) indicate flexible pastoral strategies. Approximately 40% likely grazed on naturally-available C 3 plants common in the highland puna (3,850-4,700 masl), while another ~40% likely received maize fodder closer to human settlements in the region’s fertile kichwa (3,100 – 3,850 masl). Others (~20%) show evidence of mixed C 3 and C 4 diets, suggesting seasonal movement between these environmental zones. δ 13 C and δ 18 O variation within the lives of roughly half of the camelids suggest involvement in long-distance movement, such as camelid caravans to support broader trade networks in the region that could have connected this local community to the larger sphere of Wari influence. These results on human mediated camelid subsistence practices are central to understanding how Wari influence may have impacted communities in distant regions of this Andean empire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".