MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416854463 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2025-0038

Larger trabecular bone structural units (BSU) can slow crack growth in idealized 2D extended finite element method (XFEM) models by delaying when the crack tip reaches the cement line

2025· article· en· W4416854463 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Pavel Rahovich, Krishna Challagulla, W. Brent Lievers

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCementFinite element methodTrabecula (gastropod)Parametric statisticsFragilityLine (geometry)Fracture mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trabecular bone structural units (BSU) are known to decrease in size with age, resulting in an increase in the proportion of cement line. The mechanical consequences of these changes are unclear and could either decrease fragility by redirecting cracks or increase fragility due to preferential crack growth in the cement line. To address this question, extended finite element method modelling of an idealized 2D trabecula loaded in tension, composed of repeating hexagonal BSU, has been used to perform parametric studies of geometric properties. Assuming the cement line breaks at lower strains than the BSU, the results indicate that it is the time the crack grows within the BSU, rather than the BSU size per se, that delays the failure of a trabecula under tension. The crack path was also an important factor, with lower failure strains predicted as more of the crack propagated through the cement line. These modelling results support the notion that changes in the proportions of BSU and cement line could play a role in age-related fragility. Better experimental characterization of the trabecular BSU and cement line, both in terms of their geometry and materials properties, is needed to further investigate their contributions to fragility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering→Same topicBone health and osteoporosis research→French-language works237,207→