MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416862919 · doi:10.1007/s11906-025-01348-1

THE CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE ON CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE

2025· review· en· W4416862919 on OpenAlex
Christina Antza, Nikolaos Kakaletsis, Smaro Palaska, Panagiota Anyfanti, Dimitris Triantis, Vasilios Kotsis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Hypertension Reports · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbulatory blood pressureClinical significanceBlood pressureScopusNocturnalAmbulatory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Blood pressure (BP) is involved in the pathogenesis of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and clinical research confirms this strong correlation. Data showing whether daytime or nighttime BP is the most important variable of CSVD are conflicting. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact daytime and nighttime BP in terms of CSVD correlation. Additionally, we evaluated the role of nocturnal BP variation for the same purpose. RECENT FINDINGS: We systematically searched PubMed and Scopus databases to extract data evaluating the association between different ABPM components (24 h, day- and nighttime BP, dipping patterns) and imaging features of CSVD (white matter hypersensitivies, lacunes, cerebral microbleeds). Study quality was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In the qualitative synthesis, 24 studies with 6822 patients were included. The pooled analysis of 19 studies showed that increased 24 h SBP is associated with 41% increased risk of CSVD, and this is consistently observed for both daytime and nighttime SBP. this effect is largely driven by the impact of 24 h, day- and night-time SBP on CMBs. Impaired nocturnal BP patterns are strongly associated with CSVD, specifically non-dipping profile with an OR of 2.24 (95% CI: 1.31-3.16) compared to dipping pattern. Reverse dipping was associated with CMBs with an increased OR of 3.02 (95% CI: 1.61, 4.42). Obtaining information on different components of ABPM (24 h, day- and night-time BP, dipping profile) may allow identification of patients at higher risk for CSVD including its specific subtypes, specifically CMBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.006
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it