MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416864553 · doi:10.1681/asn.2025hpj3f3g0

Graft Survival Following Microvascular Inflammation: Effect of Donor-Specific Antibodies and Cross-Match Status in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2025· article· en· W4416864553 on OpenAlexaff
Somaya Zahran, Suryanarayanan Balakrishnan, Manish J. Gandhi, Mariam P. Alexander, Carrie A. Schinstock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibodyKidneyKidney transplantationKidney transplantGraft rejectionDonor specific antibodiesNephrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a hallmark of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and is linked to variable graft outcomes. The Banff 2022 classification recognizes MVI as a spectrum based on the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). We evaluated how DSA status and flow cytometric crossmatch (XM) affect graft survival in kidney transplant recipients with MVI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of kidney transplant recipients at Mayo Clinic Rochester (2010–2024) with at least one biopsy showing MVI. Indication and surveillance biopsies (4 months, 1-, 2-, 4-, and 7-yrs post-transplant) were included. Patients were categorized into four groups: de novo DSA, preformed DSA with positive or negative XM, and no DSA. DSA was defined using MFI >1000, and de novo DSA was newly detected 3 months post-transplant. Graft survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among 3,352 recipients, 410 (12%) had MVI with DSA data: 19% de novo DSA, 62% preexisting DSA, and 19% no DSA. Among DSA-positive patients, 72% had a positive XM. Mean follow-up was 4.5±3.2 years. Graft survival differed significantly by DSA group (p = 0.031), with the best outcomes in DSA-negative patients. Survival was similar in de novo and preformed DSA groups. Among DSA-positive recipients, those with a positive XM trended toward worse survival than those with a negative XM (p = 0.062). Conclusion: In kidney transplant recipients with MVI, DSA and XM status predict graft survival. Absence of DSA was linked to better outcomes, while a positive XM identified a higher-risk group. Graft survival was similar in patients with de novo and preformed DSA, differing from prior studies—possibly due to the inclusion of surveillance biopsies, which may have enabled earlier detection. These markers can guide risk stratification and personalize post-transplant care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments→French-language works237,207→