MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416865199 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70513

Comparable outcomes between quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of studies with minimum 2‐year follow‐up

2025· review· en· W4416865199 on OpenAlex
Ehson Maleki, Ali Ahmadi Pirshahid, Lee Benaroch, Raheef Alatassi, H Maleki, Debra Bartley, Robert Litchfield, Patrick Thornley, Karthick Rangasamy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamstringMedial patellofemoral ligamentOrthopedic surgerySports medicineQuadriceps tendonSystematic review

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To systematically review existing evidence to discern the most effective autograft between the hamstring tendon (HT) and the quadriceps tendon (QT) for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction to address recurrent patellar instability. Methods: Medline, Embase and Scopus search strategies were developed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies that included isolated MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) using quadriceps or hamstring autograft on patients 12 years or older affected by recurrent patellofemoral instability with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were considered. The primary outcome of this review was the re-dislocation rate, and secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications and radiographic parameters. Results: Twelve studies, comprising 339 patients who underwent isolated MPFLR using HT autograft and 139 patients using QT autograft (follow-up range, 24-120 months), were included. Only one HT study reported patellar re-dislocations following MPFLR, with four patients requiring revision surgery. All other studies reported nil patellar re-dislocation. All studies showed significant mean improvements in postoperative Kujala (range of improvement in HT group from 26.5 to 41.4; QT group from 6.6 to 53.0) and Lysholm scores (range of improvement in HT group from 41.7 to 45.84; QT group from 10.9 to 46.0). Five studies provided postoperative Tegner Activity scores (postoperative range: 4.0-7.6). Four studies reported significant decreases in patellar tilt angle (PTA) postoperatively (range in HT group: 12.6-16.3; QT group: 13.0). Five studies reported significant decreases in the pain scale (visual analogue scale) postoperatively (range: 1.0-1.9). Seven studies reported that all patients had a full range of motion postoperatively. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in re-dislocation rate or PROMs between isolated MPFLR done with HT compared to QT autograft. Major limitations of this systematic review include a lack of strong outcome measures specific to patients with patellofemoral instability, along with few comparative studies. Level of Evidence: Level IV, a systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it