Therapeutic role of venous sinus stenting in pediatric IIH: evidence review for clinical practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children is a rare but vision-threatening condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) without an identifiable cause. While medical therapy remains the first-line approach, a subset of pediatric patients remains refractory, necessitating surgical or endovascular interventions. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting, but its safety and efficacy in pediatric populations are not well-defined. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on pediatric patients (< 18 years) with medically refractory IIH treated with VSS. Databases searched included PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and others, including studies published from January 1990 to September 2025. Data on patient selection, procedural outcomes, complications, and antiplatelet protocols were extracted and analyzed. Only studies rated ≥ 6 stars on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were included. RESULTS: Six primary studies were identified, reporting outcomes in 36 pediatric patients (mean age 13.32 ± 1.25 years). VSS led to marked improvement in headache (87.5%), papilledema (89.5%), and tinnitus (100%), with reduced need for acetazolamide in 66.7%. Complications included one retroperitoneal hematoma, decreased flow in the vein of Labbe and minor hemorrhagic events related to antiplatelet therapy, including epistaxis, menorrhagia, and oral bleeding leading to early discontinuation of clopidogrel. Persistent or recurrent symptoms after stenting underscore the need for individualized, multimodal evaluation, as standardized selection criteria for pediatric IIH are still lacking. The estimated retreatment rate across studies was approximately 20%, with re-stenting or CSF shunting required in select cases. CONCLUSION: VSS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for selected pediatric IIH patients with venous sinus stenosis and demonstrable trans-stenotic gradients. However, its success relies heavily on appropriate patient selection and tailored antiplatelet management. Prospective pediatric studies and standardized guidelines are needed to clarify its optimal role in the therapeutic algorithm. Accordingly, our synthesis is intended to inform individualized decision-making in selected cases and does not constitute guideline-level recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".