Un siècle de formation universitaire en optométrie au Canada : la contribution de l’Université de Montréal – partie 1, de 1925 à 1990
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, l’année 2025 marque pour l’optométrie un siècle de formation universitaire. En effet, en juin 1925, l’Université de Montréal a accueilli, comme école affiliée, le Collège d’optométrie, administré par l’Association des optométristes et opticiens de la province de Québec. Ce centenaire est l’occasion de retracer l’histoire de l’École d’optométrie de l’Université de Montréal (ÉOUM) et d’apprécier son évolution comme établissement d’enseignement supérieur et de recherche. La première partie de ce survol historique couvre la période de 1925 à 1990 et présente les voies empruntées par l’ÉOUM pour passer d’une simple école professionnelle à une entité alignée sur les autres écoles d’optométrie nord-américaines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".