MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416871402 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2025.2593139

Performance evaluation of healthcare services system in China considering unbalanced regional development: a meta-frontier approach

2025· article· en· W4416871402 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dawei Wang, Feng Yang, Lili Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEfficiency Analysis Using DEA
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChinaHealth careHealthcare systemHealth servicesGovernment (linguistics)Information system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the foundation of public health protection, the healthcare service system requires rigorous performance assessment to guide reforms and ensure high-quality service delivery. This study develops a novel meta-frontier super directional distance function (DDF) model to evaluate healthcare service performance across 30 Chinese provinces from 2021 to 2023, accounting for regional heterogeneity. The novel meta-frontier super DDF model effectively handles regional heterogeneity and overcomes both the issue of infeasible targets and weak group-level discrimination, thus providing meaningful information (such as meta-efficiency, group efficiency, and technology gap ratio) to guide the development of effective policies to improve efficiency. Results indicate that the traditional meta-frontier model underestimates both meta-efficiency and technology gaps compared to the proposed approach. Key findings reveal that Hainan is the most efficient province in the eastern region, Henan excels in the central region, and Sichuan stands out for its high-quality healthcare services in the west. Based on these insights, the study suggests targeted strategies for less efficient provinces, emphasizing the improvement of management practices and the reduction of regional technology gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicEfficiency Analysis Using DEAFrench-language works237,207