MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Netravani : AI based System for Translating Eye Movements into Speech

2025· article· W4416873571 on OpenAlexaff
S Shashikiran, Srinivas Babu N, B V Kirana, Shashank Patil, R Pramod, Shravan Kumar Gogi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial expressionPerceptionClosed captioningEmotion recognitionObject (grammar)DisgustInterface (matter)VisualizationKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visually impaired people continue to struggle with making sense of the world around them and interpreting social signs, often exacerbated by the expense and internet requirement of current aid technologies. This work presents NETRAVANI, a low- cost AI powered smart glasses system designed to provide real-time assistive to visually impaired. The system integrates object detection, optical character recognition (OCR), facial emotion recognition, and text-speech-conversion having wearability, and compactness in mind. Developed using Raspberry Pi, embedded vision models, speech synthesis tools. Netravanni functions completely offline, enabling effortless operation in remote and low – resources environments. By translation visual and emotional cues into audio feedback, Netreavani increases autonomy impairments and fosters, more meaningful human interactions. The proposed system the facial emotion recognition module is able to achieve approximately 70% accuracy at 8 FPS inference speed, and the scene description module achieves BLEU-1 ≈ 0.65 and METEOR ≈ 0.52. By providing real-time context-sensitive audio feedback, NetraVaani provides an inexpensive, accessible, and offline assistive tool for enhancing social interaction and environmental perception in visually impaired users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207