MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416877519 · doi:10.37665/smwidms67050

CGA Trends and Capabilities

2015· article· W4416877519 on OpenAlexaff
Marti McCurdy, Isabel Sousa, Robert Martel, Alain Lessard

Bibliographic record

VenueSMTA International · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBall grid arrayFlip chipSolderingReliability (semiconductor)Eutectic systemCeramicWettingPrinted circuit boardTemperature cycling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Column Grid Array (CGA) module is a high reliability JEDEC format package, with several options adaptable to end user needs. The dark or white ceramic thickness ranging from 1.4mm to 4.2mm and body sizes up to 52.5 mm JEDEC. The typical 42.5 mm CGA module is configured with a full array of 1089 I/O (33x33) with 1.27mm (0.050") pitch or 1657 I/O (41x41) with 1.00mm (0.040") pitch of 10/90 ( Sn/PB) columns and eutectic alloy solder connections The CGA shows superior coplanarity and reliability compared to a BGA device and can be utilized on a JEDEC register package, bare chips, or capped modules with thermal management to include wire bond or Flip Chip C4 devices. Substrate and System Level Reliability (SLR) is enhanced by a greater stand-off, flexible interconnection, improved thermal characterization, and improved thermal fatigue life of package solder joint. The contact integrity is where the Column Attach technology takes the lead over other Ball Grid predecessors. The need for complex, high density interconnects that can handle contact resistance, fatigue, CTE compliance, and ultra-high speed connectivity makes the process so valuable. The CGA has a proven long shelflife and maintains wetting properties with proper board placement as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMTA InternationalSame topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207