3D Aerosol Jet Printed Interconnects on Bare Die
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aerosol Jet [AJ] Printing can provide many enhancements over traditional bare die attachment techniques. Previous studies have shown [1] that that AJ technology offers advantages in the millimeter wave frequency range, such as a significant reduction of insertion loss and the ability to design the line impedance as required. As more designs venture into the mm-Wave/5G frequencies and higher ranges [2], board real-estate will become a premium. Printed electronics can help alleviate this problem by allowing for bare die to be used instead of standard packaged components. By utilizing printed electronics to form the connection between bare dies and CCA an increase in space of up to 40% can be achieved. For this project the team of Lockheed Martin, Binghamton University, and Optomec worked together to assembly bare die RF beamformer assembly and provided interconnects to the underlying substrate. This report provides an overview of the reason for the printing these interconnects, the overall process of assembling the substrates, the 3D printing of the interconnects, and subsequent testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it