MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416888277 · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.109175

Innovative low-tech approach for domestic wastewater treatment using vertical constructed wetlands with sugarcane bagasse substrate and Canna indica in tropical climates

2025· article· en· W4416888277 on OpenAlexaff
Nesrine Alili, Yvens Chérémond, Frédéric Monette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Process Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBagasseSubstrate (aquarium)WastewaterCannaBiofilterSewage treatmentConstructed wetland

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertical flow constructed wetlands are increasingly adopted for domestic wastewater treatment due to their effective contaminant removal and low energy use. However, availability of conventional filter media can limit implementation in some communities. This study evaluates sugarcane bagasse as an alternative filter medium during the first 10 months (start-up phase) of operation. Four pilot units (0.26 m 2 each), planted with four Canna indica seedlings, were studied under controlled tropical conditions and fed synthetic domestic wastewater. Three units contained a transition layer of bagasse fragments (5.0–10.0 mm) and retention layers consisting of P 1 (0.9–2.0 mm), P 2 (2.0–5.0 mm), and P 3 (1.2–5.0 mm). A control unit (T) included a 20 cm transition layer of gravel (5.0–10.0 mm), and a 30 cm retention layer of sand (2.0–5.0 mm) was also monitored. Each unit featured a 20 cm drainage layer of stones (19.0–45.0 mm). Results showed 43–46 % compaction of bagasse filter media height. Media size and nature affected plant growth and density, crucial for performance. After 300 days, plant densities were P 1 : 259, P 3 : 204, P 2 : 193, T: 146 stems/m 2 . Removal efficiencies (%) for TSS, BOD 5 , COD, NH₄ + /NH₃, and TP were: P 1 (88, 93, 87, 76, 49), P 3 (80, 88, 82, 61, 37), P 2 (77, 87, 78, 63, 34), and T (77, 80, 79, 62, 50). The P 1 unit, featuring the finest bagasse retention layer, demonstrated promising potential for community-scale potential applications in low-income tropical areas. Increasing the heights of the transition and retention layers is recommended to offset compaction and improve performance further. • Units with finer bagasse particles (unit P 1 ) show enhanced contaminant removal efficiency compared to coarser media. • Plant growth is more robust in units with finer filter media, indicating better physical and biological conditions. • Fine particle size contributes to improved removal of suspended solids, organic matter, and nutrients. • Bagasse is a sustainable filter medium performing as well as conventional materials for wastewater treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Process EngineeringSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207