MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416888816 · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2025.109689

Genotype-phenotype correlations of GFAP variants in type I Alexander disease subtypes

2025· article· en· W4416888816 on OpenAlexafffund
Tiziana Bachetti, Ylenia Vaia, Alice Grossi, Francesca Rosamilia, Enrico Bertini, Francesco Nicita, Deianira Bellitto, Florian Eichler, Geneviève Bernard, Amanda Nagy, Ayelet Zerem, Morteza Heidari, Ali Reza Tavasoli, Isabella Moroni, Isabella Ceccherini, Davide Tonduti

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMinistero della SaluteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchIonis Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsDiseaseGeneGenotypeGenetic variantsPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Alexander disease (AxD) is a rare and progressive leukodystrophy caused by variants in the Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) gene. AxD presents as Type I and Type II, based on clinical and neuroradiological features. However, Type I patients variable disease progression has led to sub-classify them into subtypes Ia-Ib-Ic-Id. Our study investigated genotype-phenotype correlations in Type I AxD across these subtypes. METHODS: A cohort of 74 genetically confirmed Type I AxD patients was analysed, with variants classified according to the clinical subtypes Ia, Ib, Ic, and Id. Genotypic-phenotypic correlations were explored both across all subtype groups and in stratified analyses based on patients' ability to achieve independent ambulation versus those who never acquired this milestone. To investigate the functional consequences of a representative variant, in vitro assays were performed. Selected mutant GFAP protein was expressed and their ability to assemble into intermediate filament networks was assessed. RESULTS: The study revealed a progressive decrease in GFAP allelic heterogeneity across disease subtypes from Ia to Id. Additionally, GFAP pathogenic variants in exon 1 were more frequent in milder forms, whereas mutations in exon 4 were predominantly observed in severe phenotypes. In addition, changes at p.R239 and p.R79 residues showed an opposite trend, with variants affecting p.R239 never detected in Id subtype, while variants affecting p.R79 never detected in Ia. Specific aminoacidic changes at the p.R79 residue were able to stratify patients based on ability to acquire independent ambulation or not. Furthermore, the distribution of Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores showed an inverse correlation with the acquisition of autonomous ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that specific GFAP variants could be potential predictors for disease progression in Type I AxD, supporting patients' subclassification and underscoring the importance of considering both genetic and clinical factors in AxD management, particularly as therapeutic interventions are being developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics and MetabolismSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207