MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416889528 · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2025.110682

A comprehensive review of the structural basis for the selectivity of sulfonamide-based inhibitors for carbonic anhydrase isoforms IX and XII over carbonic anhydrase II based on the available high quality crystallographic data

2025· review· en· W4416889528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme function and inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversiti MalayaUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsCarbonic anhydraseCocrystalCarbonic anhydrase IISelectivityGene isoformSulfonamideIsozymeResidue (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoxia in solid tumours induces carbonic anhydrases (CAs) upregulation, notably CA IX and CA XII, to sustain pH homeostasis. While sulfonamide-based zinc binders show high affinity for these targets, achieving the required selectivity versus the ubiquitous CA II remains challenging. Fortunately, the efforts of the community in obtaining experimental structures of ligand-protein complexes have now generated sufficient samples to rationalize isoform preferences. Herein, we provide our detailed structure-annotated meta-analysis of sulfonamide binding across CA II, CA IX, and CA XII that standardizes residue numbering and interaction taxonomy. We examine 130 X-ray cocrystal structures, CA II (47), CA IX (55), and CA XII (28), to quantify Zn-sulfonamide geometry, entrance-zone contacts (Arg60, Thr199/Thr200, His64 π-cation), conserved water mediation, and occupancy/orientation within the 130s subpocket (residues 131/132/135) that provide the best opportunities for delivering selectivity. From these data, we extract concrete, structure-derived design rules: (i) lowering sulfonamide pKa boosts affinity across isoforms but does not confer selectivity; (ii) directing steric/hydrophobic bulk into the 130s subpocket exploits Phe131/Gly132/Val135 (CA II) versus Val131/Asp132/Leu135 (CA IX) versus Ala131/Ser132/Ser135 (CA XII) differences; (iii) favourable entrance-zone interactions, e.g., salt bridging to Arg60 (IX), halogen bonding to Thr199, and occasional His64 π-cation, enhances IX/XII bias; and (iv) compact, highly polar heads without tailored tails tend to default to preferring CA II. This critical synthesis consolidates the dispersed structural evidence into an isoform-resolved map of selectivity-enabling interactions. This provides public access to a very useful tool for CA IX/XII-selective inhibitor design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it