MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416895518 · doi:10.3389/jpps.2025.15387

Compounding and stability studies of liquid oral formulations of beta-blockers (bisoprolol, betaxolol, and nadolol) for paediatric patients

2025· article· en· W4416895518 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura G. Dubois, Cyrielle Bouguergour, Romain Paoli-Lombardo, Caroline Castera‐Ducros, Christophe Jean, Mélanie Fuchs, Patrice Vanelle, Pascal Rathelot, Thierry Terme, Christophe Curti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNadololBisoprololCompoundingPreservativeHydrochlorideCitric acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In paediatric wards, bisoprolol, betaxolol, or nadolol can be administered orally at non-licensed dosages. To provide paediatric patients with appropriate treatment, batches of beta-blocker oral suspensions must be compounded, which involves subsequent stability studies. A stability-indicating HPLC-UV method and microbiological analyses were validated. Experimental batches were compounded (betaxolol hydrochloride 1 mg.mL −1 , bisoprolol hemifumarate 0.5 mg.mL −1 and nadolol 10 mg.mL −1 ). Bisoprolol hemifumarate 0.5 mg.mL −1 and nadolol 10 mg.mL −1 needed the addition of citric acid (3 mg.mL −1 ) and potassium sorbate (3 mg.mL −1 ) to ensure preservative efficacy. Betaxolol hydrochloride 1 mg.mL −1 was stable for 2 months when stored at 2–8 °C, for 1 month after opening at 2–8 °C, and for 15 days when stored at 25 °C/60% RH. Bisoprolol hemifumarate 0.5 mg.mL −1 was stable for 2 months when stored at 2–8 °C, for 1 month after opening at 2–8 °C, and for 15 days when stored at 25 °C/60% RH. Nadolol 10 mg.mL −1 was stable for 3 months when stored at 2–8 °C, for 1 month after opening at 2–8 °C, and for 15 days when stored at 25 °C/60% RH. Hospital pharmacies can compound batches of beta-blocker liquid oral suspensions and store them for secure dispensing and administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207