Comparative Genomics of the Testacea Group of <i>Drosophila</i> Reveals Introgression and Variation in Chromosome Size and Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparative genomic analyses among closely related species provide an opportunity to assess their evolutionary history. The relatedness between species can depend on a variety of factors, including reproductive isolation, introgression, and incomplete lineage sorting, and this can impact divergence across the genome. Here, we use a combination of long- and short-read sequencing and HI-C scaffolding to assemble genomes for each of the four species in the testacea species group of Drosophila, including D. testacea, D. orientacea, D. neotestacea, and D. putrida, and its outgroup, D. bizonata. First, among species, we find many structural rearrangements across the genome as well as a large size difference in the dot chromosome that we infer is due to the expansion of repetitive elements. Second, we assess phylogenetic discordance and uncover a difference in the phylogeny inferred from genes on Muller E and the mitogenome relative to the rest of the genome, which may be due to recent hybridization. Lastly, we assess the rate of molecular evolution of genes shared across all species and identify genes evolving at different rates across the phylogeny. Our results present genomic resources for this species group and begin to probe into some of the evolutionary characteristics that contribute to variation in genome structure, while highlighting the need for high-quality genome resources to fully capture and understand the evolutionary history among closely related species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".